首页> 外文OA文献 >How effective are created or restored freshwater wetlands for nitrogen and phosphorus removal? A systematic review protocol
【2h】

How effective are created or restored freshwater wetlands for nitrogen and phosphorus removal? A systematic review protocol

机译:创造或恢复淡水湿地对氮和磷的去除效果如何?系统评价协议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Eutrophication of aquatic environments is a major environmental problem in large parts of the world.In Europe, EU legislation (the Water Framework Directive and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive),international conventions (OSPAR, HELCOM) and national environmental objectives emphasize the need to reducethe input of plant nutrients to freshwater and marine environments. A widely used method to achieve this is to letwater pass through a constructed or restored wetland (CW). However, the large variation in measured nutrientremoval rates in such wetlands calls for a systematic review. The objective of this review is to quantify nitrogen andphosphorus removal rates in constructed or restored wetlands and relate them to wetland characteristics, loading characteristics, and climate factors. Wetlands are created to treat water from a number of different sources. Sources that will be considered in this review include agricultural runoff and urban storm water run-off, as well as aquaculture wastewater and outlets from domestic wastewater treatment plants, with particular attention to thesituation in Sweden. Although the performance of wetlands in temperate and boreal regions is most relevant tothe Swedish stakeholders a wider range of climatic conditions will be considered in order to make a thorough evaluation of climatic factors. Methods: Searches for primary studies will be performed in electronic databases as well as on the internet. Oneauthor will perform the screening of all retrieved articles at the title and abstract level. To check that the screeningis consistent and complies with the agreed inclusion/exclusion criteria, subsets of 100 articles will be screened by the other authors. When screening at full-text level the articles will be evenly distributed among the authors. Kappatests will be used to evaluate screening consistency. Data synthesis will be based on meta-regression. The nutrient removal rates will be taken as response variables and the effect modifiers will be used as explanatory variables. More specifically, the meta-regression will be performed using generalized additive models that can handle nonlinear relationships and major interaction effects. Furthermore, subgroup analyses will be undertaken to elucidate statistical relationships that are specific to particular types of wetlands.
机译:背景:水体富营养化是世界上大部分地区的主要环境问题。在欧洲,欧盟立法(《水框架指令》和《海洋战略框架指令》),国际公约(OSPAR,HELCOM)和国家环境目标都强调了这一需求减少植物养分向淡水和海洋环境的输入。实现这一目标的一种广泛使用的方法是让水流经人工或修复的湿地(CW)。然而,在这些湿地中测得的营养去除率差异很大,需要系统地审查。本文的目的是量化人工或恢复湿地中氮和磷的去除率,并将其与湿地特征,负荷特征和气候因素相关联。建立湿地是为了处理来自许多不同来源的水。本次审查将考虑的来源包括农业径流和城市雨水径流,以及水产养殖废水和生活污水处理厂的出口,尤其要注意瑞典的情况。尽管温带和北方地区的湿地性能与瑞典的利益相关者最为相关,但仍将考虑更广泛的气候条件,以便对气候因素进行全面评估。方法:将在电子数据库以及互联网上进行基础研究的搜索。 Oneauthor将在标题和摘要级别对所有检索到的文章进行筛选。为了检查筛选是否一致并符合商定的纳入/排除标准,其他作者将筛选100篇文章的子集。在全文阅读时,文章将在作者之间平均分配。 Kappatests将用于评估筛选的一致性。数据综合将基于元回归。营养物去除率将作为响应变量,效果修饰符将用作解释变量。更具体地说,将使用可处理非线性关系和主要相互作用效应的广义加性模型执行元回归。此外,将进行亚组分析以阐明特定类型湿地的统计关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号